Search for: All records

Fires in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) are a global issue with growing importance. However, the impact of WUI fires on air quality and health is less understood compared to that of fires in wildland. We analyze WUI fire impacts on air quality and health at the global scale using a multi-scale atmospheric chemistry model—the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols model (MUSICA). WUI fires have notable impacts on key air pollutants [e.g., carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), fine particulate matter (PM_2.5), and ozone (O₃)]. The health impact of WUI fire emission is disproportionately large compared to wildland fires primarily because WUI fires are closer to human settlement. Globally, the fraction of WUI fire–caused annual premature deaths (APDs) to all fire–caused APDs is about three times of the fraction of WUI fire emissions to all fire emissions. The developed model framework can be applied to address critical needs in understanding and mitigating WUI fires and their impacts. 

Abstract. Tropospheric ozone is a major air pollutant and greenhouse gas. It is also the primary precursor of OH, the main tropospheric oxidant. Global atmospheric chemistry models show large differences in their simulations of tropospheric ozone budgets. Here we implement the widely used GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry module as an alternative to CAM-chem within the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2). We compare the resulting GEOS-Chem and CAM-chem simulations of tropospheric ozone and related species within CESM2 to observations from ozonesondes, surface sites, the ATom-1 aircraft campaign over the Pacific and Atlantic, and the KORUS-AQ aircraft campaign over the Seoul Metropolitan Area. We find that GEOS-Chem and CAM-chem within CESM2 have similar tropospheric ozone budgets and concentrations usually within 5 ppb but important differences in the underlying processes including (1) photolysis scheme (no aerosol effects in CAM-chem), (2) aerosol nitrate photolysis, (3) N2O5 cloud uptake, (4) tropospheric halogen chemistry, and (5) ozone deposition to the oceans. Global tropospheric OH concentrations are the same in both models, but there are large regional differences reflecting the above processes. Carbon monoxide is lower in CAM-chem (and lower than observations), at least in part because of higher OH concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere and insufficient production from isoprene oxidation in the Southern Hemisphere. CESM2 does not scavenge water-soluble gases in convective updrafts, leading to some upper-tropospheric biases. Comparison to KORUS-AQ observations shows an overestimate of ozone above 4 km altitude in both models, which at least in GEOS-Chem is due to inadequate scavenging of particulate nitrate in convective updrafts in CESM2, leading to excessive NO production from nitrate photolysis. The KORUS-AQ comparison also suggests insufficient boundary layer mixing in CESM2. This implementation and evaluation of GEOS-Chem in CESM2 contribute to the MUSICA vision of modularizing tropospheric chemistry in Earth system models. 

Abstract Chlorinated very short‐lived substances (Cl‐VSLS) are ubiquitous in the troposphere and can contribute to the stratospheric chlorine budget. In this study, we present measurements of atmospheric dichloromethane (CH₂Cl₂), tetrachloroethene (C₂Cl₄), chloroform (CHCl₃), and 1,2‐dichloroethane (1,2‐DCA) obtained during the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) global‐scale aircraft mission (2016–2018), and use the Community Earth System Model (CESM) updated with recent chlorine chemistry to further investigate their global tropospheric distribution. The measured global average Cl‐VSLS mixing ratios, from 0.2 to 13 km altitude, were 46.6 ppt (CH₂Cl₂), 9.6 ppt (CHCl₃), 7.8 ppt (1,2‐DCA), and 0.84 ppt (C₂Cl₄) measured by the NSF NCAR Trace Organic Analyzer (TOGA) during ATom. Both measurements and model show distinct hemispheric gradients with the mean measured Northern to Southern Hemisphere (NH/SH) ratio of 2 or greater for all four Cl‐VSLS. In addition, the TOGA profiles over the NH mid‐latitudes showed general enhancements in the Pacific basin compared to the Atlantic basin, with up to ∼18 ppt difference for CH₂Cl₂in the mid troposphere. We tagged regional source emissions of CH₂Cl₂and C₂Cl₄in the model and found that Asian emissions dominate the global distributions of these species both at the surface (950 hPa) and at high altitudes (150 hPa). Overall, our results confirm relatively high mixing ratios of Cl‐VSLS in the UTLS region and show that the CESM model does a reasonable job of simulating their global abundance but we also note the uncertainties with Cl‐VSLS emissions and active chlorine sources in the model. These findings will be used to validate future emission inventories and to investigate the fast convective transport of Cl‐VSLS to the UTLS region and their impact on stratospheric ozone. 

Abstract. We quantify future changes in wildfire burned area and carbon emissions inthe 21st century under four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) scenariosand two SSP5-8.5-based solar geoengineering scenarios with a target surfacetemperature defined by SSP2-4.5 – solar irradiance reduction (G6solar) andstratospheric sulfate aerosol injections (G6sulfur) – and explore themechanisms that drive solar geoengineering impacts on fires. This study isbased on fully coupled climate–chemistry simulations with simulatedoccurrence of fires (burned area and carbon emissions) using the WholeAtmosphere Community Climate Model version 6 (WACCM6) as the atmosphericcomponent of the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2). Globally,total wildfire burned area is projected to increase over the 21st centuryunder scenarios without geoengineering and decrease under the twogeoengineering scenarios. By the end of the century, the two geoengineeringscenarios have lower burned area and fire carbon emissions than not onlytheir base-climate scenario SSP5-8.5 but also the targeted-climate scenarioSSP2-4.5. Geoengineering reduces wildfire occurrence by decreasing surfacetemperature and wind speed and increasing relative humidity and soil water,with the exception of boreal regions where geoengineering increases theoccurrence of wildfires due to a decrease in relative humidity and soilwater compared with the present day. This leads to a global reduction in burnedarea and fire carbon emissions by the end of the century relative to theirbase-climate scenario SSP5-8.5. However, geoengineering also yieldsreductions in precipitation compared with a warming climate, which offsetssome of the fire reduction. Overall, the impacts of the different drivingfactors are larger on burned area than fire carbon emissions. In general,the stratospheric sulfate aerosol approach has a stronger fire-reducingeffect than the solar irradiance reduction approach. 

Abstract. We present the Fire Inventory from National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) version 2.5 (FINNv2.5), a fire emissions inventory that provides publicly available emissions of trace gases and aerosols for various applications, including use in global and regional atmospheric chemistry modeling. FINNv2.5 includes numerous updates to the FINN version 1 framework to better represent burned area, vegetation burned, and chemicals emitted. Major changes include the use of active fire detections from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) at 375 m spatial resolution, which allows smaller fires to be included in the emissions processing. The calculation of burned area has been updated such that a more rigorous approach is used to aggregate fire detections, which better accounts for larger fires and enables using multiple satellite products simultaneously for emissions estimates. Fuel characterization and emissions factors have also been updated in FINNv2.5. Daily fire emissions for many trace gases and aerosols are determined for 2002–2019 (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-only fire detections) and 2012–2019 (MODIS + VIIRS fire detections). The non-methane organic gas emissions are allocated to the species of several commonly used chemical mechanisms. We compare FINNv2.5 emissions against other widely used fire emissions inventories. The performance of FINNv2.5 emissions as inputs to a chemical transport model is assessed with satellite observations. Uncertainties in the emissions estimates remain, particularly in Africa and South America during August–October and in southeast and equatorial Asia in March and April. Recommendations for future evaluation and use are given. 

Abstract. We implement the GEOS-Chem chemistry module as a chemical mechanism in version 2 of the Community Earth System Model (CESM). Our implementation allowsthe state-of-the-science GEOS-Chem chemistry module to be used with identical emissions, meteorology, and climate feedbacks as the CAM-chemchemistry module within CESM. We use coupling interfaces to allow GEOS-Chem to operate almost unchanged within CESM. Aerosols are converted at eachtime step between the GEOS-Chem bulk representation and the size-resolved representation of CESM's Modal Aerosol Model (MAM4). Land-type informationneeded for dry-deposition calculations in GEOS-Chem is communicated through a coupler, allowing online land–atmosphere interactions. Wet scavengingin GEOS-Chem is replaced with the Neu and Prather scheme, and a common emissions approach is developed for both CAM-chem and GEOS-Chem in CESM. We compare how GEOS-Chem embedded in CESM (C-GC) compares to the existing CAM-chem chemistry option (C-CC) when used to simulate atmosphericchemistry in 2016, with identical meteorology and emissions. We compare the atmospheric composition and deposition tendencies between the twosimulations and evaluate the residual differences between C-GC and its use as a stand-alone chemistry transport model in the GEOS-Chem HighPerformance configuration (S-GC). We find that stratospheric ozone agrees well between the three models, with differences of less than 10 % inthe core of the ozone layer, but that ozone in the troposphere is generally lower in C-GC than in either C-CC or S-GC. This is likely due to greatertropospheric concentrations of bromine, although other factors such as water vapor may contribute to lesser or greater extents depending on theregion. This difference in tropospheric ozone is not uniform, with tropospheric ozone in C-GC being 30 % lower in the Southern Hemisphere whencompared with S-GC but within 10 % in the Northern Hemisphere. This suggests differences in the effects of anthropogenic emissions. Aerosolconcentrations in C-GC agree with those in S-GC at low altitudes in the tropics but are over 100 % greater in the upper troposphere due todifferences in the representation of convective scavenging. We also find that water vapor concentrations vary substantially between the stand-aloneand CESM-implemented version of GEOS-Chem, as the simulated hydrological cycle in CESM diverges from that represented in the source NASA Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (Version 2; MERRA-2)reanalysis meteorology which is used directly in the GEOS-Chem chemistrytransport model (CTM). Our implementation of GEOS-Chem as a chemistry option in CESM (including full chemistry–climate feedback) is publicly available and is beingconsidered for inclusion in the CESM main code repository. This work is a significant step in the MUlti-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry andAerosols (MUSICA) project, enabling two communities of atmospheric researchers (CESM and GEOS-Chem) to share expertise through a common modelingframework, thereby accelerating progress in atmospheric science. 

Abstract. Emissions are a central component of atmosphericchemistry models. The Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) is a softwarecomponent for computing emissions from a user-selected ensemble of emissioninventories and algorithms. It allows users to re-grid, combine, overwrite,subset, and scale emissions from different inventories through aconfiguration file and with no change to the model source code. Theconfiguration file also maps emissions to model species with appropriateunits. HEMCO can operate in offline stand-alone mode, but more importantlyit provides an online facility for models to compute emissions at runtime.HEMCO complies with the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) forportability across models. We present a new version here, HEMCO 3.0, thatfeatures an improved three-layer architecture to facilitate implementationinto any atmospheric model and improved capability for calculatingemissions at any model resolution including multiscale and unstructuredgrids. The three-layer architecture of HEMCO 3.0 includes (1) the Data InputLayer that reads the configuration file and accesses the HEMCO library ofemission inventories and other environmental data, (2) the HEMCO Core thatcomputes emissions on the user-selected HEMCO grid, and (3) the ModelInterface Layer that re-grids (if needed) and serves the data to theatmospheric model and also serves model data to the HEMCO Core forcomputing emissions dependent on model state (such as from dust or vegetation). The HEMCO Core is common to the implementation in all models, whilethe Data Input Layer and the Model Interface Layer are adaptable to themodel environment. Default versions of the Data Input Layer and ModelInterface Layer enable straightforward implementation of HEMCO in any simplemodel architecture, and options are available to disable features such asre-gridding that may be done by independent couplers in more complexarchitectures. The HEMCO library of emission inventories and algorithms iscontinuously enriched through user contributions so that new inventoriescan be immediately shared across models. HEMCO can also serve as a generaldata broker for models to process input data not only for emissions but forany gridded environmental datasets. We describe existing implementations ofHEMCO 3.0 in (1) the GEOS-Chem “Classic” chemical transport model withshared-memory infrastructure, (2) the high-performance GEOS-Chem (GCHP)model with distributed-memory architecture, (3) the NASA GEOS Earth SystemModel (GEOS ESM), (4) the Weather Research and Forecasting model withGEOS-Chem (WRF-GC), (5) the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2),and (6) the NOAA Global Ensemble Forecast System – Aerosols(GEFS-Aerosols), as well as the planned implementation in the NOAA Unified ForecastSystem (UFS). Implementation of HEMCO in CESM2 contributes to theMulti-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICA) by providinga common emissions infrastructure to support different simulations ofatmospheric chemistry across scales.